On Birth Control vs. Hobby Lobby

How about this: perhaps the Federal Government take the tax dollars they are exacting from those who do not want or cannot afford Obamacare and use it buy birth control for those who voted for Obama. Kill two birds with one Pill, or something like that...

In other words, there are so many things wrong with this scenario that Hobby Lobby not being required to provide birth control to their employees is really one of the least of my worries. Do Liberals really think that what they do to businesses and individuals in terms of enforced control is any different than the Supreme Court's decision? Or does it just piss them off that someone is a higher authority than they are (at this point in time)? How did the Supreme Court acquire so much power anyway... funny you should ask... I would bet you a $10 bill that it had to do with Liberal involvement, because when have they ever voted for the government to have less power?

Chew on that.

Also, the Supreme Court could not win, no matter what they did. If they voted that Hobby Lobby be required to provide birth control, then they would be giving even more credibility to the unconstitutional Obamacare. Why do Liberals cry out in favor of the Constitution whenever they believe the right of business owner's are being upheld, but disregard it when when something like Obamacare is being promoted?
Poppycock.

I just post these thoughts here because I don't feel like having to defend my ideas to those who would probably disagree with them on Facebook. I find the defending argument illogical, unreasonable, and foolish. It is also based on assumptions I do not accept. It would be an exercise in futility. But I've gotta tell someone.